Kicked out from the Commerce Casino for Player Banking Blackjack and Baccarat at

Baccarat Tips Video Source & Information:

You came across this post because you probably were searching for information on player banked games in card rooms in California or other states.
Please contact me at commerceplayerbankers@gmail.com if you have been personally banned, barred, asked to leave the Commerce Casino because you “tried” to be a player banker and were kicked out. If you know of someone else who has been banned or barred, please have them contact me as well. I was personally banned for player banking baccarat at the Commerce Casino.
I am in the process of filing a class action lawsuit in conjuction with members of the California Indian Tribal Council. The Commerce Casinos consistent habit of banning and barring players/customers who player bank baccarat, blackjack and other games is illegal.
I already have a dozen people who have contacted me and confirmed that they have been banned from the Commerce Casino for specifically player banking baccarat, blackjack and other games. The higher the number of people I have, the better case we have.
Anyone familiar with player banking knows that the Commerce Casino cannot ban customers who player bank. They can ban you for almost any other reason (fighting, drinking, etc), but players are protected by the D.O.J.
This post applies specifically to the Commerce Casino in Los Angeles, CA but will be applicable to other Card rooms as well. California State Law (protected by the Department of Justice) states that any individual can act as a player banker inside the Commerce casino for California card games such as Baccarat, Blackjack, Paigow, Ultimate Texas Holdem, Three Card Poker, Crazy Poker and other games. There may be new games or new versions of games by the the time you read this post.
It is illegal for the Commerce Casino to directly profit from players/gamblers in the games listed above. This is different from Las Vegas Casinos and Indian Tribal Casinos who payout out all winnings and losses directly to the player.
A third party corporation sits at every California game table and pays a collection every hand for the right to collect all winnings and payout all losses to the players who bet. The Commerce casino makes money from this collection on every hand. The collection could range from $2-$15 per hand and up. After every two hands the dealer offers every other player sitting at the table to have this same option: payout the winnings and collect the losses with their own personal money. I usually sit down to bank with $10,000-$30,000 personally, but an individual can player bank with the table minimum. Obviously if a player bets a $500 and wins and the player banker can’t pay them, the player is upset, but the player banker still has this right to “bank” that hand.
I was making very good money before I was banned. The casino and third party corporation don’t want any competition. However, if enough of us come together in this lawsuit, we will be able to take legal action and change these habits of banning players for “trying” to bank California Table Games.

contact: commerceplayerbankers@gmail.com
https://www.facebook.com/?ref=tn_tnmn

Source: YouTube

Share this video:
Kicked out from the Commerce Casino for Player Banking Blackjack and Baccarat at

10 thoughts on “Kicked out from the Commerce Casino for Player Banking Blackjack and Baccarat at

  1. I haven’t been banned yet but I’m with you on the fact that it’s wrong they did. But I’m playing at a different casino

  2. He asserts that the DOJ is behind him and that it is illegal to ban player banking. But he offers no proof and quotes no law that backs up his claim. I am familiar with player banking and have played and banked at commerce and Oceans 11 down near San Diego. It may be against the california gaming commission gaming compact. Don't know. Show the law or statue or policies

  3. I point out that at Oceans 11, if there is not much action or players they will often and usually not let a player bank often. The banker corporation is the one that usually complains because no doubt they want to bank. Is what they do legal? paigow poker

  4. What happened to this story? I want to know if this person able to get a class action against Commerce Casino for banning him from player banking? Yes, I know it back in 2017 issue.
    All card room (Bicycle, Commerce, etc) are Class ll type gaming (aka card room, card club), meaning the players play against other players money and not the house. Las Vegas and Indian casino are Class lll gaming type, which the house is the banker.
    This is the regulation set by the Department of Justice for all the card club/room in California. And in California, state law prohibits card clubs from having any financial stake in the outcome of the card games that take place in their establishments.
    IMO, who knows, maybe the casino themselves are the player banker under a different corporation name. That's why they don't want anyone else other than the corporation banker banking in their establishment.

Comments are closed.