Poker Strategy Info And Source:
One of poker’s biggest-ever winners, Alex Millar (aka Kanu7), is joining the Upswing Poker team. In advance of his upcoming course, today he shares some insights on playing postflop on monotone board textures.
Get Alex’s course here: https://upswingpoker.com/advanced-cash-game-strategy-with-kanu7/
Watch the remaining parts of this series:
Part 2 https://youtu.be/LN4z6gkDGes
Part 3 https://youtu.be/eDriDqKnPQM
Part 4 https://youtu.be/_DdbzMTQg1o
Part 5 https://youtu.be/dI_qPUgvWSs
Check out the written version of this video here: https://upswingpoker.com/monotone-flops-kanu7/
Upswing Poker was founded by Ryan Fee, Doug Polk and Matt Colletta to help players learn the fundamentals and theory to becoming solid winning players. Learn poker strategy from the world’s top no limit players at http://www.upswingpoker.com/
Source: YouTube
what software is he using? amazing video
Doug is completely over poker but doing anything he can to kill the games off completely lol
Great vid
Typical overthinking. It’s all smoke screens – 20/20 hindsight
Very basic technique to mislead the consumer
Not only that, how many “customers” are playing at these limits? Probably zero. If they were they wouldnt need “coaching”. Amazing how many people fall for the modern day poker coaching phenomenon
This rubbish is the truly literal definition of exploitative marketing strategy
Cures insomnia
Great video Alex Millar. Really well explained!
Why do you think 50% cbet,50% check is a simplication, it's really not that different than 47.5% cbet etc, anyway in game we're playing hands, and deciding between bet/check/raise with our hand, so if there's a clear boundary, it's a simplication, if it's not, then it's not a simplication. So if it's a pure strategy(like range bet),then it automatically satisfy the previous condition. If it's a mixed strategy, then we need to know where the boundary is, if the boundary is very clear, then it's a simplication.Why everyone think 50% cbet,50% check is a simplication?Just because the percentage number looks good? If a 47.779% cbet has a clear boundary, then it's a simplication.I'm interested in your course, but must state this before buy.
Love the 'poker millionaire' title…can tell Doug was behind that
Lovely video, just missed you talking about 1 thing:
Why the frequencies of x/raising go way down on a monotone board?
When betting so large on the flop like OTB did in the first example, it forces you to have a much more complex strategy. You will have to balance your checking range with strong hands, and reduce your c-betting frequency overall… I find it interesting, because most players today are doing the opposite. Betting small at high frequency when they are perceived to have a range advantage… Thanks for the free content as always.