Poker Solvers Explained

Learn Texas Holdem Video Source & Info:

Fedor Holz breaks down what he learned working with solvers in this peek behind the scenes of what a Pokercode live coaching session looks like.

If you’re interested in becoming a better poker player and want to improve your game, check out http://bit.ly/PokercodeYT and subscribe now.

Follow us on social media
https://www.instagram.com/pokercodeofficial/

https://www.facebook.com/pokercodeofficial/
https://twitch.tv/pokercodeofficial

Source: YouTube

Share this video:
Poker Solvers Explained

10 thoughts on “Poker Solvers Explained

  1. i'm not complaining, but you should know that if you bought a nice camera and mic, and paid for some good production, you would have way more interest in your videos. Even one of the greatest tournament players ever can be hamstrung by poor quality. Big fan, tho!

  2. Im not good at poker, but i am good at chess, one reason i havent ever used a poker solver is because in chess engines are a REALLY bad idea for begginers, yes they come up with the best move but its the best move if you can think several hundred million moves a second, if your a begginer at chess you will struggle to think 3 moves ahead correctly in 20 mins, i assumed poker was the same.

  3. The reason I refuse to believe that solvers work is (Really the fact Im too lazy to understand them) But Qualia as stated by the youtuber exurb1a in his video titled "there's no such thing as orange" – Add that with the element of bluffing in poker coupled with the concept of fate or are we the ones in control = humans are spontaneous and understanding poker I feel is like a mixture of becoming a lockpicking safecracker with an extremely gentle ear & touch mixed with being an artist thats why Im skeptical on how effective solvers may be, not to mention that humans are probably telepathic and thats why we make some great hero calls vrs some great lay downs who the love knows it'll all be revealed thousands of years from now.

  4. Although on second thought our patterns are probably way more recognisable than we feel they are so I might have to look itnto these solvers at the end of the day 1 thing is crystal clear Fedor is in a big boy house Im in a dingy flat that I dont even own lol real talk!

  5. "Formulating my thoughts" I call this "guestimating". Like you said you get better feedback because there's an emotional response to the answer. (Always guys what type of hands your opponent will flip over before calling)

  6. Poker will NEVER get at the same point Chess is. Chess has no bluff, chess is and objective game, and it can be beaten. Poker can never be beaten because its subjective, too many bluffs win pots, playing wrong wins TOO MANY POTS, including against the best in the world.

  7. Fedor, ich habe seit 10 Jahren eine Idee die ich mit niemandem geteilt habe. Diese Idee ist einzigartig, das heißt, ist es mal auf dem Markt gibt es keine Konkurrenz, jedoch habe ich es nie geschafft diese Idee zu verwirklichen weil es mir quasi an allem fehlt. Am meisten wegen der finanziellen Lage und ich keine Unterstützung aus dem Umfeld bekomme. Um die Idee zu verwirklichen müsste ich anderen Menschen vertrauen, ist die Idee einmal veröffentlicht, wozu braucht man mich dann noch ? Die Gefahr dass es mir gestohlen wird ist sehr groß. Mein großer Traum und höchstwahrscheinlich die einfachste Methode um die Idee zu verwirklichen wäre einen ICO zu starten aber dafür bräuchte man auch Menschen mit EDV Kenntnissen. Kannst du mir einen Ratschlag geben oder hättest du gar Lust dich daran zu beteiligen ? ICO starten kostet für mich viel aber für dich ist das eine relativ kleine Summe, lass mich wissen und Danke für das Video, Vielen Dank !

  8. ty .. but w all the respect ..2:42 i think u mistaken gto with nash eq. [ nash lines / sum 0 ev lines ] .. gto is a mix of theories startin 7-8 decades ago & its a very complicated definition especially after solvers models ..

Comments are closed.